The Man Who Would Be King (If Obama Lets Him)

It has been said that without George W. Bush, Obama would not have been president. There is some truth to that. Had the Bush presidency not gone up in such spectacular flames and had the mood of the country not been so dire it is hard to imagine that Americans would have gravitated the way they did to the message of a young, single term African American Senator.

 A good portion of Obama’s appeal was that he was in many ways the opposite of Bush. Where as Bush was relatively short, Obama was relatively tall. Bush had a father, a famous one, Obama only met his twice. Bush went to schools that had scholarships named after his family, Obama was the one getting those scholarships. Bush had trouble speaking, Obama could always speak.  And then there is the obvious racial difference which underscored the entire campaign.

Democrats were smart in 2008. They knew that the country didn’t just want someone who was the political opposite of Bush but someone who was the opposite in every single way. They had learned from their mistake in 2004 in running John Kerry who was politically opposite from Bush but in every other way cut from the same patrician cloth.

American politics has always been like this. We tend to elect president’s who are not only political opposites of their predecessors but also the opposites in terms of personality and character. It is almost as if Presidents are not so much self-made as they are children begat by the previous President leaving office.

 Do you think a nice, well meaning naïve peanut farmer would have ever been elected President if Americans were not reeling from the Nixon Years and were yearning for someone who was distinctly outside the beltway? Nixon gave birth to Carter. After a few years of the nice but weak, slightly depressing Carter, we were ready for someone who could start carrying the country confidently again. Carter in turn begot Reagan. And so on.

The guys who are able to defeat the incumbent president or party do so because they represent not only an ideological turn but a turn in personality and character. Youthful, dynamic Clinton over stogy Bush I. Religious and moral Bush II over the too slick for his own good Clinton. I know Bush technically ran against Gore but he was really running against Clinton just as Obama was really running against Bush and not McCain.

Now, what does this mean for the 2012 cycle? It means that the Republicans if they are smart will find someone who is in every way the opposite of Obama. Being the incumbent, Obama will have all sorts of advantages going into the election. If they run someone who doesn’t represent a complete break from Obama, both in his or her approach to governing and his or her personality then Americans will go with what they know. Can we go through a process of elimination find the perfect candidate for this 2012 election cycle?

Obama’s experience is limited so the Republicans will need someone who has lots of government and private sector experience –eliminate Sarah Palin.

Obama is young, boyish so the Republicans will need someone who is older, more adult like –eliminate Tim Pawlenty, Bobby Jindal.

Obama is very telegenic and charismatic so the Republicans will need someone who seems more plainspoken and down to earth – eliminate Mitt Romney.

Obama is too over exposed and the media is too saturated with him so the Republicans will need someone who is relatively unknown and not trying to constantly grab face time – eliminate Mike Huckabee and eliminate Sarah Palin again.

So who are we left with after this process of elimination? Who is the anti-Obama? The answer is….

This guy…Mitch Daniels, the Governor of Indiana.

You’ve probably  never heard of him. Let me just give you a quick summary. Mitch Daniels is a short, quiet, not particularly charismatic, plain spoken down to earth Midwesterner who has loads of government and private sector experience and more than anyone else fully grasps the fiscal issues this country is faced with. Hearing him speak reminds you that adults still do exist in this country. He is already building some support and momentum going into this cycle. It still is unclear if he will run or not but a lot of smart people within the party would like him to.

More on Daniels at a later point.

Share / Save this Post

46 Responses to “The Man Who Would Be King (If Obama Lets Him)”

  1. Dale says:

    I used to vote Republican in Indiana until this guy ran. He’s sold off the toll road to another country and outsourced more jobs than created in this state. He’s raised taxes instead of cutting budgets to try and reduce the states debt at a cripple to anyone of the middle class and below. He denied state employees raises during two years when inflation and cost of living went up substantially. Most of all, when the state needed real problems fixed he managed to incorporate daylight savings into our schedules as well. The only reason he is still Governor is that no one worthy has run against him. But hey, at least we have a lot of new asphalt on the highway thanks to all the sin taxes he’s added as well. It’s nice to know the casinos in the state are still not paying for education as well. Ditch Mitch, He’s not my man and he’ll never be president.

  2. joe says:

    Bush os 5’11 / 6 ‘ – so that’s BS.

    Bush only “crashed and burned” cause the press was in the tank of the left an the jihdists for 8 years (and they still are).

    And Palin has plenty of private sector and gov experience – MORE THAN OBAMA and she raised a family without killing her babies as their heads poked out.

    And Daniels is a RINO – we went thru that with McPain, no thanks.

    • Brian Finn says:

      ive met both guys. bush is 5’10 tops. obama is at least 6’2.” Bush might even be 5’9.” He’s ridiculously short in person

  3. softstars says:

    Thank you..really informative!!

  4. Robbins Mitchell says:

    Well.of Mitchy boy is such an ‘adult’,then why did he whuss out and give in to the Democrats in the Indiana legislature who left the state?…after this act of political cowardice,I doubt that very many ‘smart people’ in the GOP will want him to run in 2012..and I speak as someone who as been working in GOP campaigns for over 30 years

  5. jqcpqzhyup says:

    pDsu3N djbnfnnjerzd, [url=]szsqcrefdjxy[/url], [link=]jtrzlxgisvqd[/link],

  6. Driesyrem says:

    The more varied the characters, the better, as far as I’m concerned.

  7. Unsarddiasp says:

    The Iranian government intends to use the nuclear program for peaceful purposes, but must convince international public opinion of that.

  8. Eloise Carley says:

    Nearly all of what you mention happens to be astonishingly accurate and that makes me wonder the reason why I hadn’t looked at this with this light before. This particular article truly did turn the light on for me as far as this specific subject goes. Nevertheless at this time there is actually one issue I am not really too comfy with so while I make an effort to reconcile that with the actual central idea of your issue, let me see just what all the rest of the visitors have to say.Nicely done.

Share Your Comment