<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macroeconomic Woes &#187; Energy markets</title>
	<atom:link href="/category/energy-markets/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://macroeconomicwoes.com</link>
	<description>A blog focused on economic and social commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 16:30:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why you shouldn’t read the NY Times for oil market information</title>
		<link>https://macroeconomicwoes.com/energy-markets/why-you-shouldn%e2%80%99t-read-the-ny-times-for-oil-market-information.html</link>
		<comments>https://macroeconomicwoes.com/energy-markets/why-you-shouldn%e2%80%99t-read-the-ny-times-for-oil-market-information.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 02:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaeson Rosenfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy markets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macroeconomicwoes.com/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, one of the lead economic correspondents from the New York Times tweeted a story from the NYT with the headline “US Economy is Better Prepared for Rising Gas Costs.” (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/09/business/economy/09gasoline.html). On its face, it seems reasonable enough – we’ve been facing high oil prices during much of the last decade, so to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://macroeconomicwoes.com/energy-markets/why-you-shouldn%e2%80%99t-read-the-ny-times-for-oil-market-information.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
